You can avoid two calls to the bookmaker and lock in the current line on a later game by telling your bookmaker you want to make an “if” bet. “If” bets can also be made on two games kicking off at exactly the same time. The bookmaker will wait until the first game is over. If the initial game wins, he’ll put an equal amount on the second game though it was already played.

Although an “if” bet is obviously two straight bets at normal vig, you can’t decide later that you will no longer want the second bet. Once you make an “if” bet, the second bet cannot be cancelled, even when the second game has not gone off yet. If the initial game wins, you may have action on the second game. For this reason, there is less control over an “if” bet than over two straight bets. When the 2 games you bet overlap with time, however, the only method to bet one as long as another wins is by placing an “if” bet. Obviously, when two games overlap with time, cancellation of the second game bet is not an issue. It ought to be noted, that whenever the 2 games start at differing times, most books won’t permit you to fill out the second game later. You need to designate both teams once you make the bet.

You possibly can make an “if” bet by saying to the bookmaker, “I want to make an ‘if’ bet,” and then, “Give me Team A IF Team B for $100.” Giving your bookmaker that instruction will be the identical to betting $110 to win $100 on Team A, and then, as long as Team A wins, betting another $110 to win $100 on Team B.

If the initial team in the “if” bet loses, there is no bet on the second team. Regardless of whether the second team wins of loses, your total loss on the “if” bet could be $110 once you lose on the initial team. If the initial team wins, however, you would have a bet of $110 to win $100 going on the second team. Because case, if the second team loses, your total loss could be just the $10 of vig on the split of the 2 teams. If both games win, you would win $100 on Team A and $100 on Team B, for a complete win of $200. Thus, the most loss on an “if” could be $110, and the most win could be $200. That is balanced by the disadvantage of losing the full $110, rather than $10 of vig, everytime the teams split with the initial team in the bet losing.

Bettors soon found that the best way to steer clear of the uncertainty caused by the order of wins and loses is to produce two “if” bets putting each team first. Rather than betting $110 on ” Team A if Team B,” you would bet just $55 on ” Team A if Team B.” and then produce a second “if” bet reversing the order of the teams for another $55. The 2nd bet would put Team B first and Team A second. This kind of double bet, reversing the order of exactly the same two teams, is known as an “if/reverse” or sometimes just a “reverse.”

If both teams win, the end result will be the same as you played just one “if” bet for $100. You win $50 on Team A in the initial “if bet, and then $50 on Team B, for a complete win of $100. In the second “if” bet, you win $50 on Team B, and then $50 on Team A, for a complete win of $100. The 2 “if” bets together result in a total win of $200 when both teams win.

If both teams lose, the end result would also be just like if you played just one “if” bet for $100. Team A’s loss would set you back $55 in the initial “if” combination, and nothing would go onto Team B. In the second combination, Team B’s loss would set you back $55 and nothing would go onto to Team A. You would lose $55 on all the bets for a complete maximum loss of $110 whenever both teams lose.

The difference occurs when the teams split. Rather than losing $110 when the initial team loses and the second wins, and $10 when the initial team wins but the second loses, in the reverse you will lose $60 on a separate no matter what team wins and which loses. It computes this way. If Team A loses you will lose $55 on the initial combination, and have nothing going on the winning Team B. แทงมวยสเต็ป In the second combination, you will win $50 on Team B, and have action on Team A for a $55 loss, resulting in a net loss on the second combination of $5 vig. The loss of $55 on the initial “if” bet and $5 on the second “if” bet offers you a combined loss of $60 on the “reverse.” When Team B loses, you will lose the $5 vig on the initial combination and the $55 on the second combination for exactly the same $60 on the split..

We have accomplished this smaller loss of $60 in place of $110 when the initial team loses with no reduction in the win when both teams win. In both single $110 “if” bet and the 2 reversed “if” bets for $55, the win is $200 when both teams cover the spread. The bookmakers would not put themselves at that sort of disadvantage, however. The gain of $50 whenever Team A loses is fully offset by the excess $50 loss ($60 in place of $10) whenever Team B could be the loser. Thus, the “reverse” doesn’t actually save us hardly any money, nonetheless it does have the main advantage of making the danger more predictable, and steering clear of the worry regarding which team to place first in the “if” bet.

DON’T, if you’re able to win more than 52.5% or more of one’s games. If you fail to consistently achieve a profitable percentage, however, making “if” bets if you bet two teams could save you money.

For the winning bettor, the “if” bet adds some luck to your betting equation that doesn’t belong there. If two games are worth betting, then they ought to both be bet. Betting on one should not be produced influenced by whether you win another. On one other hand, for the bettor who includes a negative expectation, the “if” bet will prevent him from betting on the second team whenever the initial team loses. By preventing some bets, the “if” bet saves the negative expectation bettor some vig.

The $10 savings for the “if” bettor results from the fact that he is not betting the second game when both lose. Compared to the straight bettor, the “if” bettor comes with an additional cost of $100 when Team A loses and Team B wins, but he saves $110 when Team A and Team B both lose.

The rule for the winning bettor is exactly opposite. Anything that keeps the winning bettor from betting more games is bad, and therefore “if” bets will definitely cost the winning handicapper money. Once the winning bettor plays fewer games, he has fewer winners. Remember that the next time someone lets you know that the best way to win is to bet fewer games. An intelligent winner never really wants to bet fewer games. Since “if/reverses” work-out exactly the same as “if” bets, they both place the winner at an equal disadvantage.

Exceptions to the Rule – Whenever a Winner Should Bet Parlays and “IF’s”
Just like all rules, you can find exceptions. “If” bets and parlays should be produced by successful with a confident expectation in mere two circumstances::

If you find no other choice and she must bet either an “if/reverse,” a parlay, or a teaser; or
When betting co-dependent propositions.
The only time I will consider that you’ve no other choice is if you’re the best man at your friend’s wedding, you’re waiting to walk down the aisle, your laptop looked ridiculous in the pocket of one’s tux so you left it in the automobile, you simply bet offshore in a deposit account with no credit line, the book includes a $50 minimum phone bet, you want two games which overlap with time, you grab your trusty cell 5 minutes before kickoff and 45 seconds before you must walk to the alter with some beastly bride’s maid in a frilly purple dress on your own arm, you try to produce two $55 bets and suddenly realize you simply have $75 in your account.

Since the old philosopher used to state, “Is that what’s troubling you, bucky?” If that’s the case, hold your mind up high, put a smile on that person, look for the silver lining, and produce a $50 “if” bet on your own two teams. Obviously you could bet a parlay, but as you will dsicover below, the “if/reverse” is a good substitute for the parlay if you’re winner.

For the winner, the best method is straight betting. In the event of co-dependent bets, however, as already discussed, there is an enormous advantage to betting combinations. With a parlay, the bettor is getting the advantage of increased parlay odds of 13-5 on combined bets that have greater than the normal expectation of winning. Since, by definition, co-dependent bets must often be contained within exactly the same game, they need to be produced as “if” bets. With a co-dependent bet our advantage originates from the fact that we make the second bet only IF one of many propositions wins.

It would do us no good to straight bet $110 each on the favourite and the underdog and $110 each on the over and the under. We would simply lose the vig no matter how usually the favorite and over or the underdog and under combinations won. As we’ve seen, if we play two out of 4 possible results in two parlays of the favourite and over and the underdog and under, we could net a $160 win when one of our combinations comes in. When to find the parlay or the “reverse” when creating co-dependent combinations is discussed below.

Choosing Between “IF” Bets and Parlays
Predicated on a $110 parlay, which we’ll use for the purpose of consistent comparisons, our net parlay win when one of our combinations hits is $176 (the $286 win on the winning parlay without the $110 loss on the losing parlay). In a $110 “reverse” bet our net win could be $180 everytime one of our combinations hits (the $400 win on the winning if/reverse without the $220 loss on the losing if/reverse).